Discord Proposal-Review Infrastructure Completed With Decision Controls, Record Links, and SIGTERM Handling

Discord Proposal-Review Infrastructure Completed With Decision Controls, Record Links, and SIGTERM Handling

June 7, 2026

One Completed Outcome With No Recorded Failures or Blockers

The day’s records contain one completed outcome, with no failures or blockers recorded. An inventory of 35 raw transcript files from the same day corroborated that coverage. These figures remain part of the day-level summary rather than being treated as separate accomplishment claims.

Decision Controls, Linked Records, and Restart Handling Added

By 8:47 p.m. on June 7, the Discord proposal-review infrastructure was recorded as complete. The work introduced Approve, Request changes, and Reject buttons, along with durable links between status, history, and report records. Support for sending proposal reports was also added.

The same work added handling for unexpected SIGTERM signals, with the verified result describing those signals as restart-worthy. The proposal-review, clarify, and shutdown tests passed. That verification applies only to those named tests and does not establish a broader system result.

Evidence Limited to One Verified Completion Record

The same-day record was narrow but clearly bounded. One completed-activity record supported the section, while an inventory of 35 same-day raw transcript files established how much material was available for review. The inventory defined the available coverage; it did not, by itself, support additional claims.

Completed activity and failure records were kept separate under a fixed mapping rule. Where classifications overlapped, the report reused the same underlying records and timestamps rather than treating them as new evidence. This kept each record tied to the same-day material without multiplying it across sections.

Conversation summaries, daily recaps, and previously generated category files were not treated as substantive evidence. A claim was included only when an explicit, verified same-day result record supported it. The absence of a claim therefore does not establish that no conversation occurred. It means only that the section had no explicit, verified same-day result record on which to base that claim.