What the Available Evidence Can and Cannot Establish
Neither the completed-activity source nor the source for failures and blockers contained any same-day records. Those zero-record counts define the verified evidence available in both categories, but they do not describe the full volume of conversation activity that day.
Separately, 88 same-day raw transcript files were inventoried to assess coverage. The inventory was not treated as verified authority for substantive claims. A transcript file showed only that material had been identified for coverage—not that it contained a result that could be reported as completed, failed, blocked, recovered, decided, or partially completed.
Completed activity and failure records were kept distinct through separate identifiers. Where recovery, material-decision, or partial-work classifications overlapped, the report reused the identifier and timestamp associated with the underlying event. Reuse meant that the same event appeared under more than one classification; it did not create an additional event and could not be counted separately.
Conversation summaries, daily recaps, and previously generated category files were excluded as substantive evidence. A claim was included only when an explicit, same-day verified-result record supported it. That threshold also limits what can be inferred from silence: the absence of a claim means the required verified record was unavailable, not that no conversation occurred.